Just a heads-up — we'll be doing some maintenance on Oct 18, 2025, 11:50:00 PM. A few features might be unavailable for a short while.

Money Laundering

Zia Charitable Trust Corruption Case

What Is the Case About?



  • The case involves allegations that Khaleda Zia (former PM of Bangladesh) and others misused funds raised for the Zia Charitable Trust.

  • The prosecution claimed they "abused power to raise funds … from unknown sources."

  • According to the 2018 court verdict, around Tk 2.17 crore (about 21.7 million taka) was collected from unknown sources.

  • There were also alleged irregularities in how over Tk 1.24 crore was spent, particularly in the purchase of land in the trust’s name.

  • The judgement said money was deposited into a Sonali Bank account (Prime Minister’s Office branch) in January 2005.

  • The court also criticized that while a huge sum was deposited, the land purchased was not properly mutated in the trust’s name at the time of filing the case.


Legal Timeline



  • The Anti‑Corruption Commission (ACC) filed the case on 8 August 2011 with Tejgaon Police Station.

  • Charges were framed on 19 March 2014.

  • On 29 October 2018, a Special Court (Court‑5) sentenced Khaleda Zia to 7 years’ rigorous imprisonment and fined her Tk 10 lakh (1 million Taka).

  • The court said if the fine wasn’t paid, there would be an extra 6 months in jail.

  • On 27 November 2024, the High Court acquitted Khaleda Zia, scrapping her 7-year sentence.

  • On 3 March 2025, the Supreme Court’s Appellate Division upheld that High Court acquittal, rejecting the ACC’s appeal.


Significance & Observations



  • The case was politically significant because Khaleda Zia is a major political figure (BNP leader), and such corruption cases have strong political overtones.

  • Her legal team argued that the trust was private, run on its own funds, and no state money was involved.

  • With the Supreme Court’s decision, her 7-year sentence was fully overturned.

  • The ACC and the prosecution had challenged her acquittal, but their leave-to-appeal was rejected by the SC.

08 Aug, 2011

Sources